Absolutely no idea , I will let you knowShould you shorten the tank levers to lower your arms, will the steering force and sensitivity increase then and steering become twitchy ?
tried that in post #130 it was very noisy as the chain really wants a pulley to keep it in place.As for the devious twisted chain i only have a tube on the untensionned return of the tadpole. Crude, suboptimal and effective as soviet mechanics.
Yes it is confusing as I can't cut the old off till I am sure the new will work and I can't do that till I can drive it and I can't do that till I can sit on it and I can't do that till ...........So, the old lever was the vertical part, and the new lever is the part with the bar end shifter, out on the horizontal arm?
I'm sure, obvious to you, but I'm trying to understand![]()
This car was stood for over 2 years , it has taken it's visible toll on the chassis and body work , would not be surprised if the brake calipers suffered as well.On my wife's trike, I had to take the calipers apart, and clean the pistons, before they would adjust properly.
Well I agree with you up to the point where you say ' They're cheap enough ' these are Magura hydraulics , not my first choice for a race car ?In hindsight, it probably would have been easier to just buy new ones - They're cheap enough, or were, anyway.
Oh, that makes a big difference - I was thinking cable brakes.these are Magura hydraulics
I do think they are OK apart from the sticking piston , the lever is not spongy in any way and the car certainly seems to stop OK at the low speeds I have achieved so farAre you sure the hydraulics are working right?
Maybe the system needs to be bled, or something.
I wanted to swap , however that would mean at least 1 new brake mount....If it doesn't free off successfully it may need a rebuild. Magura are famous for not selling rebuild seal kits. They'd rather you send them the caliper and pay a large sum. It'd likely be cheaper to buy a cheap Chinese replacement. Hydraulics generally provide much more braking force than cables. If you need to brake a lot in a race that could add up. If you rarely brake then swap to cables if it doesn't free off enough.
Need a better angled shot really but can you not take support struts off the rear/top face of that rearmost chassis-rail straight up to that angle-iron you have across the back of the seat? The angle of the ones seen in the picture will give no real vertical support I feel. The angle from rail to seat angle-iron needs to be a lot steeper I think. Clearly, you don't want a floppy parallelogram formed but you don't need to cross them over to prevent that, just put additional triangulation up from that crossrail to the strut itself. The triangle formed prevents the pantograph/parallelogram from collapsing HTH.So front seat mount , no hiding the fact the seat mounting holes are not in the right place for the cross member , also they are a long way around the front slope oh and point forwards at some craze angle.
So 2 new mounts and a rusty piece of square tubing underneath the seat front positioned for the visible seat bolts to use.![]()
![]()
Brackets cut from some big section square tubing 3mm wall , however the large sections have a very generous radius on the corners causing some problems for TIG man ! [ this weld is much more in MIG territory ]
![]()
Still I can make a blobby neat[ish] weld , just it won't be in the very root of the corner [ not skilled enough ]
Seat can't get any lower [ honest ] as it is chain runs up to rear cassette large sprocket in the channel caused by the rear seat ribs ...![]()
We are living on the edge....
Still got to weld front part seat bolted to in , then on to a better rear seat mount.
![]()
As this one turned out to be pants , under to much tension , to close to cassette and used the existing seat mounting bolts that are far to low down.
Paul
I don't like the position of the angle iron IMHO it is much to low on the seat back , it needs to be up where the M8's can be seen protruding from the plank of wood.Need a better angled shot really but can you not take support struts off the rear/top face of that rearmost chassis-rail straight up to that angle-iron you have across the back of the seat? The angle of the ones seen in the picture will give no real vertical support I feel. The angle from rail to seat angle-iron needs to be a lot steeper I think. Clearly, you don't want a floppy parallelogram formed but you don't need to cross them over to prevent that, just put additional triangulation up from that crossrail to the strut itself. The triangle formed prevents the pantograph/parallelogram from collapsing HTH.![]()